The Henry County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing this week to gather input on a proposed open burning ordinance aimed at reducing unnecessary emergency calls and ensuring safe outdoor fire practices. While the ordinance has been in discussion for over a month, members of the public voiced concerns about the timing, accessibility, and clarity of the draft.
The hearing was opened by the board following a motion and vote. Chairman Marc Lindeen acknowledged the ordinance had been made available at the auditor’s office since May 15.
The ordinance outlines fire safety measures during state-issued burn bans, including requirements for spark screens on burn barrels and mandatory notifications to authorities before larger burns. It exempts recreational campfires and cooking fires but mandates stricter guidelines during hazardous conditions. However, confusion arose over key sections—such as what qualifies as a burn permit and how to obtain one—and whether the ordinance applies only during burn bans or at all times.
Henry County Emergency Management Coordinator Walt Jackson clarified that the ordinance is only enforceable during state-issued burn bans, not year-round. He noted that during red flag warnings, the ban periods are often brief, typically lasting 6 to 12 hours. He also emphasized the importance of education alongside enforcement, saying, “Every time we make a change, it’s an opportunity to educate the public so they know what the rules are.”
Supervisor Chad White, a frequent burner himself, said he had reviewed the draft ordinance and found nothing overly restrictive, but acknowledged that more clarity in the ordinance might be helpful for some residents. He also noted that several people have already begun voluntarily notifying dispatchers before conducting burns.
The board confirmed that no additional public hearings are currently scheduled, though they acknowledged a second hearing could be added.
Some members of the public urged the board to consider holding one more hearing, arguing that time and additional public exposure—through newspapers, radio, and social media—would allow for more informed feedback.
The supervisors ultimately exited the public hearing phase without committing to an additional session, but left the possibility open depending on public response in the coming weeks.
Residents are encouraged to contact their supervisors directly with comments or concerns in the meantime.